These days, AI image generation has reached the point where the results are genuinely useful for social media, presentations, personal projects, and creative work. The quality varies significantly between tools.

The main image generators

Midjourney
What it isThe highest-quality AI image generator, accessed through Discord or the web
Best atArtistic, photorealistic, and stylised images with exceptional quality and coherence
Free tierNo free tier (previously offered a trial, now requires a subscription)
First paid tierBasic Plan - US$10/month (~A$16/month)
Ken's takeMidjourney produces the best-looking images of any AI tool I have used. The quality gap between Midjourney and free alternatives is noticeable. The catch is that it used to require Discord, which confused many people. They now have a web app that is much easier to use. The latest model, V8 Alpha (released March 2026), runs about five times faster than V7, supports native 2K output via the --hd parameter, and is markedly better at complex compositions. Worth the US$10 if you create images regularly.
Sign uphttps://midjourney.com
Ideogram
What it isAI image generator that excels at putting readable text into images
Best atLogos, social media graphics, posters, anything that needs legible text in the image
Free tierFree tier with limited daily generations
First paid tierBasic Plan - US$8/month (~A$13/month)
Ken's takeMost AI image tools are terrible at text. Letters come out garbled and unreadable. Ideogram solves this. If you need a poster, a social graphic with a quote, or a logo concept, this is the tool. The free tier is enough to test it.
Sign uphttps://ideogram.ai
ChatGPT Image Generation (GPT Image 1.5)
What it isImage generation built directly into ChatGPT. The current model is GPT Image 1.5, OpenAI's anointed successor to DALL-E (DALL-E 3 was retired from ChatGPT in late 2025 and is being deprecated from the API on 12 May 2026).
Best atQuick image generation without leaving your chat, iterative editing through conversation, text rendering inside images (which Midjourney still struggles with), and generating images as part of a broader task. Currently sits at the top of LM Arena's image-generation leaderboard.
Free tierIncluded in ChatGPT free tier (limited generations)
First paid tierIncluded with ChatGPT Plus - US$20/month (~A$32/month)
Ken's takeIf you already pay for ChatGPT Plus, you have this included. No need for a separate subscription. The quality has caught up to a point where, for most non-artistic uses, you no longer need Midjourney as well. Where Midjourney still wins is on stylised and editorial work; where GPT Image 1.5 wins is text inside the image and conversational iteration.
Sign uphttps://chat.openai.com

Brief mention: Adobe Firefly is worth knowing about if you already use Photoshop or Illustrator. It integrates AI generation directly into those tools. Free tier gives 25 credits/month. Standalone plans start at around US$5/month. The image quality is behind Midjourney, but the commercial safety (trained on licensed content) is a selling point for business use.

Other image tools worth knowing about

Beyond the three above, four more deserve a mention. They sit in different niches: open-source for full control, fast-and-cheap via developer APIs, all-in-one creative suites, and game-art specialists. None replace Midjourney for headline image quality, but each is the right pick for a particular kind of work.

Leonardo AI
What it isAn AI image generator with a strong free tier and a focus on game art, fantasy illustration and stylised work. Owned by Canva (acquired 2024) but operates as a separate product
Best atStylised and game-art generation. Fine-tuning on your own characters or assets. The free tier of 150 daily tokens is the most generous in the category
Free tierFree tier with 150 daily tokens (resets each day)
First paid tierApprentice - US$10/month (~A$16/month)
Ken's takeIf you make game art, fantasy illustration or anything where you want to lock in a particular character or style across many images, Leonardo is the right tool. The fine-tuning workflow is friendlier than Stable Diffusion. The free tier is genuinely usable, with daily refresh meaning you can experiment without committing. For straight headline-quality realism, Midjourney still wins. For ongoing creative work with consistent characters, Leonardo earns its place.
Sign uphttps://leonardo.ai
Krea AI
What it isA creative suite covering image generation, video and 3D work. Real-time generation means you see changes as you adjust the prompt
Best atIterative creative work. The Plus plan ($25 a month) gives unlimited image generation across multiple premium models, which is unusual at this price
Free tierFree tier with limited daily generations
First paid tierBasic - US$9/month (~A$14/month). Plus tier at US$25/month gets unlimited image generation
Ken's takeReal-time generation is the headline feature. You see the image change as you type, which makes iteration fast in a way the others are not. Krea bundles image, video and 3D in one tool, so if you do all three, the Plus plan ($25/month with unlimited image gen) is good value. Brand recognition lags Midjourney and Adobe Firefly. Quality is good but specialists beat it on specific tasks. Worth a try on the free tier first.
Sign uphttps://krea.ai
Stable Diffusion
What it isOpen-source image models from Stability AI that you can run on your own computer or via hosted services. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large is the current flagship
Best atFull creative control with no vendor lock-in. The massive ecosystem of community LoRAs (small fine-tunes) and extensions means you can adapt the model to almost any style
Free tierFree to download and run on your own GPU (open weights)
First paid tierPay-per-use via hosted providers like Replicate or fal.ai (typically a few cents per image), or Stability AI's own API
Ken's takeStable Diffusion is the open-source option. If you have a capable GPU and do not mind a bit of setup, you can run it locally and generate as many images as you want for free, no subscriptions, no content filters, no internet connection required. The community ecosystem is enormous. The trade-off is image quality below Midjourney V8 and Flux on most benchmarks, plus a steeper learning curve. Not for casual users. The right pick for power users, hobbyists, and anyone with privacy concerns about cloud generation.
Sign uphttps://stability.ai
Flux
What it isImage models from Black Forest Labs (the original Stable Diffusion team). Mainly used by developers via API rather than a consumer web app
Best atImage-to-image work and very cheap generation. The Schnell variant is fast and costs around $0.003 per image. Pro is competitive with Midjourney on quality. The Krea-tuned variants lead image-to-image work
Free tierNone directly. Free tiers exist on third-party providers
First paid tierPay-per-image. Schnell from US$0.003/image, Dev and Pro from US$0.04-0.05/image
Ken's takeFlux is mostly used inside other tools rather than directly. If you use Krea, fal.ai, Replicate or any of the open AI image platforms, you have probably already used Flux without knowing. Worth knowing about as a name because it shows up in vendor specs and pricing pages. For end users with no developer interest, just use Krea or Midjourney. The quality varies widely between Schnell, Dev and Pro tiers, so check which one a host is actually using.
Sign uphttps://bfl.ai (developer-focused) or via Krea

Try this right now (free)

Open ChatGPT (even the free version) and type: "Create an image of a cosy Australian country kitchen with morning light coming through the window, a cup of coffee on a wooden table, and a cat sleeping on a chair." See what comes back. Then try: "Make the light warmer and add a bookshelf in the background."

See also: AI-generated images pair well with Presentations and Video. For turning ideas into full slide decks with images, the presentations page shows how.